Review Content
A 4-agent quality gate where independent reviewers score content and reach consensus on publish, revise, or reject.
Review Content is the final gate in the content pipeline. Four agents — Editor, Strategist, Buyer Advocate, and Brand Guardian — independently evaluate the content against their domain criteria. Each agent scores 1-10 and provides a verdict (publish/revise/reject) with specific citations. A consensus matrix aggregates results: unanimous publish ships, any reject blocks, mixed revise triggers specific rework instructions. The agents run via Task tool in isolated contexts so they cannot influence each other. The 4-agent structure catches issues that any single reviewer misses: the Editor might approve copy that the Buyer Advocate flags as tone-deaf to the ICP. Every newsletter run produces the consensus matrix as a trackable artifact.
Where it shows up:
Related Terms
Methodology
Quality Gate
An automated checkpoint in a skill chain that evaluates output against defined criteria before allow...
Methodology
Multi-Agent Debate
A moderated discussion between persona agents where each argues from their buyer perspective, produc...
Skills Layer
Edit Content
A 44-principle editorial review skill that scores content against anti-slop rules, voice standards, ...
Skills Layer
Skeptical Buyer
A 6-step buyer critique skill that reads content as a busy, skeptical ICP and flags anything that wo...